Video of Inaugural lecture Prof G.P. Mifsud Bonnici: Towards transparent technology: developing appropriate fundamental rights safeguards and remedies
“Most of us own a smart phone, a smart TV and perhaps are thinking of buying a driverless car. We can also think of all the applications monitoring different dimensions of our health or performance in sport or our financial transactions and so forth. The past decades have seen an increase in information technology tools aimed at maximising convenience over other values such as privacy. When technical tools and applications are well fitted to, and integrated with our own lives and projects, they become transparent, invisible-in-use to us. Until they become transparent, one may still be aware of their beneficial effect on our life and potential negative aspects of using a particular technology such as an interference with our privacy if our personal information is used inappropriately. But the more transparent technology around us becomes the less we will notice its presence and effects.
Based on the principle of prevention is better than cure, Prof. Jeanne Mifsud Bonnici argues that we need to embed fundamental rights safeguards in the building of all new technologies and we need to identify clear remedies for infringement of rights. We need this embedding as the more transparent the technology becomes the more safeguards and remedies become opaque to citizens. But how should this be done? And by who? In essence, Mifsud Bonnici argues, this is a shared responsibility by states, private parties and citizens in search for better safeguards and remedies. The lecture explains how the Security, Technology and e-Privacy Research Group (STeP) co-lead by Prof Mifsud Bonnici has been active in identifying safeguards and remedies needed in the use and deployment of smart surveillance technologies and how this work will be taken up in the future to cover other emerging transparent technologies.”
The inaugural lecture took place in the Academy Building of the University of Groningen on 3rd May 2016.
Last modified: | 19 January 2024 08.59 a.m. |
More news
-
09 October 2024
Automating the taking of witness statements in criminal cases using AI
Can the taking of witness statements in criminal cases be automated using artificial intelligence (AI)? The University of Groningen (UG), Capgemini Netherlands and Scotty AI signed a letter of intent today to jointly research the development of an...
-
17 September 2024
Vehicles without a driver: who is liable if things go wrong?
In the coming years, self-driving cars may increasingly become part of daily life. But who is liable if things go wrong?
-
20 August 2024
The knotty issue of holding countries responsible for cyberattacks
Evgeni Moyakine is investigating whether countries can be held responsible for cyberattacks by hacker groups. He believes that the standards set by international law regarding the burden of proof are too stringent.