Commentary on the article “Overestimation of water pressure by traditional water footprint: Method revision and application” by Liu et al. (DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112225)
Authors: Libor Ansorge, Santiago David Vaca-Jiménez, Winnie Gerbens-Leenes, Maite M. Aldaya, Shervin Jamshidi, Keivan Arastou, Lara Wöhler.
Journal: Ecological Indicators 167, October 2024, 112617
Abstract
Dear editors of Ecological Indicators,
The recently published article “Overestimation of water pressure by traditional water footprint: Method revision and application” (Liu et al., 2024) contains a number of ambiguities and imprecisions, which could be described as errors in the use of the water footprint (WF) methodology, and thus, the presented results are not correct, respectively do not capture human appropriation of water resource use as explained and justified by the concept developers. At the same time, the article introduces the concept of the so-called blue-grey water footprint. In this contribution, first, the ambiguities in the published article, which probably stem from a misinterpretation of the WF concept, are critically discussed. Then, the “blue-grey water footprint” introduced is reviewed and further discussed, especially regarding its inconsistency with the principles of the WF concept introduced in the Water Footprint Assessment Manual by Hoekstra et al. (2011). This commentary focuses on the major flaws and discusses the most relevant shortcomings of this article.
Last modified: | 24 October 2024 08.26 a.m. |
More news
-
10 June 2024
Swarming around a skyscraper
Every two weeks, UG Makers puts the spotlight on a researcher who has created something tangible, ranging from homemade measuring equipment for academic research to small or larger products that can change our daily lives. That is how UG...
-
21 May 2024
Results of 2024 University elections
The votes have been counted and the results of the University elections are in!