Jean Monnet funding for Prof. Ramses Wessel for research on European diplomacy

A proposal on the legal constraints and opportunities for the European Union to further its ambitions as an international diplomatic actor has been selected by the European Commission. This project will be led by Prof. Ramses Wessel (European Law) in a network including the Universities of Leuven, Pisa and Geneva. For the coming three years this network aims to study the European Union’s diplomatic activities throughout the world, in third states as well as in international organizations. The new network, EUDIPLO, will also strengthen cooperation between senior and junior staff at the four universities and will involve practitioners as well as partners in Africa, Asia, North America, Latin America and Oceania, as well as in a number of neighbouring states.
Ramses already participates in another Jean Monnet network (with Salamanca, Rome, Paris, Oslo and VU Amsterdam) on legal questions of European integration. Part of the latter network is the journal on law and integration European Papers.
This article was published by the Faculty of Law.
Last modified: | 26 June 2025 12.35 p.m. |
More news
-
13 October 2025
Liekuut | Control: an unclear magic word, with a price tag
Regie, regie, regie. Solke Munneke, hoogleraar staatsrecht, kwam het woord opeens overal tegen: in wetsvoorstellen, brieven, toelichtingen en vooral nu: in partijprogramma’s. Het wordt gepresenteerd als oplossing voor alle grote problemen. Het klinkt...
-
30 September 2025
Michael O’Flaherty gives second Röling lecture in Groningen: War, Peace and Human Rights
From Ukraine to Gaza: every day shows how fragile peace and human rights are – and how urgent the question is of what role human rights can play in achieving and maintaining peace.
On Wednesday 10 December 2025, International Human Rights Day, Michael...
-
29 September 2025
Liekuut | Why political parties should be required to have members
Unlike in several European countries, political parties in the Netherlands are not required to have members. Why is this the case, and would it not be sensible to embed a minimum number in law?