Onmiddellijke handhaving van de openbare orde of bestuursdwang? Het bevel en de last in historisch en rechtsvergelijkend perspectief
PhD ceremony: Ms. L.D. Ruigrok, 16.15 uur, Academiegebouw, Broerstraat 5, Groningen
Dissertation: Onmiddellijke handhaving van de openbare orde of bestuursdwang? Het bevel en de last in historisch en rechtsvergelijkend perspectief
Promotor(s): prof. J.G. Brouwer, F.R. Vermeer
Faculty: Law
Ruigrok’s thesis refers to the burgomaster’s competences to immediately enforce public order pursuant to the Dutch Municipalities Act and his power to take a decision containing an instruction under the threat of enforcement action. The form and execution of these two competence systems are very similar; in both cases the unwritten restorative measure (bevel) or decision (last) is physically executed. Over the past decades immediate enforcement of public order by the burgomaster evidently shows a trend toward juridification. Restorative measures to immediately enforce public order are put down in writing nearly by default. For example several days prior to soccer games, demonstrations or public events unwritten emergency restorative measures will be issued in writing. Such unwritten restorative measures thus have become an order within the meaning of the General Administrative Law Act, as is the case with decisions containing an instruction under the threat of enforcement action. Burgomasters occasionally force themselves to try to comply with the requirements of a regular order within the meaning of the General Administrative Law Act. The development of the law in this context is striking in view of Article 5:23 Awb, whereas in this provision the legislator ensures rapid and decisive action in order to enforce public order. With her research Ruigrok has formed a soundly based judgment of the trend regarding the juridification of immediate enforcement of public order, bearing in mind its large impact. She has also determined the situations in which a decision containing an instruction under the threat of enforcement action - and thus a decision containing an instruction under the threat of an astreinte - offers an alternative to the competences to immediately enforce public order.
Last modified: | 13 March 2020 01.02 a.m. |
More news
-
22 April 2025
Impact | Online advice about right to freedom of assembly
In the coming weeks the nominees for the Ben Feringa Impact Award 2025 will introduce themselves and their impactful research or project. This week: Noor Swart and Berend Roorda, on their online information initiative on the right of freedom to...
-
22 April 2025
How do you shield yourself from Big Tech's power?
How can we all become less dependent on Big Tech? A topical and urgent question that is also arising within the University. Recently, a petition by a group of staff members made the rounds that called for the University to break away from Google and...
-
15 April 2025
The Faculty of Law launches podcast The Right to News
On 16 April 2025, the Faculty of Law at the University of Groningen will launch the first episode of its podcast The Right to News (in Dutch: Recht op Nieuws). The theme of the first episode is: “Can the government just ban organizations in the...