Onmiddellijke handhaving van de openbare orde of bestuursdwang? Het bevel en de last in historisch en rechtsvergelijkend perspectief
PhD ceremony: Ms. L.D. Ruigrok, 16.15 uur, Academiegebouw, Broerstraat 5, Groningen
Dissertation: Onmiddellijke handhaving van de openbare orde of bestuursdwang? Het bevel en de last in historisch en rechtsvergelijkend perspectief
Promotor(s): prof. J.G. Brouwer, F.R. Vermeer
Faculty: Law
Ruigrok’s thesis refers to the burgomaster’s competences to immediately enforce public order pursuant to the Dutch Municipalities Act and his power to take a decision containing an instruction under the threat of enforcement action. The form and execution of these two competence systems are very similar; in both cases the unwritten restorative measure (bevel) or decision (last) is physically executed. Over the past decades immediate enforcement of public order by the burgomaster evidently shows a trend toward juridification. Restorative measures to immediately enforce public order are put down in writing nearly by default. For example several days prior to soccer games, demonstrations or public events unwritten emergency restorative measures will be issued in writing. Such unwritten restorative measures thus have become an order within the meaning of the General Administrative Law Act, as is the case with decisions containing an instruction under the threat of enforcement action. Burgomasters occasionally force themselves to try to comply with the requirements of a regular order within the meaning of the General Administrative Law Act. The development of the law in this context is striking in view of Article 5:23 Awb, whereas in this provision the legislator ensures rapid and decisive action in order to enforce public order. With her research Ruigrok has formed a soundly based judgment of the trend regarding the juridification of immediate enforcement of public order, bearing in mind its large impact. She has also determined the situations in which a decision containing an instruction under the threat of enforcement action - and thus a decision containing an instruction under the threat of an astreinte - offers an alternative to the competences to immediately enforce public order.
Last modified: | 13 March 2020 01.02 a.m. |
More news
-
18 November 2024
Bigger than femicide alone – the role of gender in violence
In the media and politics, there is rising attention to femicide — the murder of women, often by a partner or a former partner. Martina Althoff, associate professor of Criminology, welcomes this but is critical at the same time.
-
09 October 2024
Automating the taking of witness statements in criminal cases using AI
Can the taking of witness statements in criminal cases be automated using artificial intelligence (AI)? The University of Groningen (UG), Capgemini Netherlands and Scotty AI signed a letter of intent today to jointly research the development of an...
-
17 September 2024
Vehicles without a driver: who is liable if things go wrong?
In the coming years, self-driving cars may increasingly become part of daily life. But who is liable if things go wrong?