Taking governance seriously in legal research
Title: Taking governance seriously in legal research
Faculty: Law
Several academic discourses on governance are going on since the 1970s and 1980s. They relate to different fields of law and regulation, including corporation law (corporate governance), administrative law (good governance of public administrations), international law and international relations (governance of nations and global governance), legal theory (governance as a legal style), EU law (governance of the EU), European private law and governance, Internet law and governance, law and governance of the health care system, contract law and governance, land law and governance, etc.
To a great extent, these discourses have been running separately from each other. An academic meta-discourse on law and governance that compares all these discourses and binds them together is still missing.
I believe that developing such a comparative meta-discourse would benefit both science and society. In particular, we would need a comparative analysis of the good governance aspects pertaining to the above-mentioned ten discourses. This would let us better reflect on good governance in each single field of law and regulation, and help societal actors better realise such good governance.
A first comparison of the said ten discourses enables us to single out some core features of good governance: legality, efficiency, transparency, accountability, best representation of interests, non-discrimination, and human rights protection. Arguably, these are universal parameters of good governance of every human institution, be it public, private or public-private. Therefore, public law scholars and private law scholars should work together much more intensively than they are actually doing now.
Last modified: | 13 March 2020 01.12 a.m. |
More news
-
18 November 2024
Bigger than femicide alone – the role of gender in violence
In the media and politics, there is rising attention to femicide — the murder of women, often by a partner or a former partner. Martina Althoff, associate professor of Criminology, welcomes this but is critical at the same time.
-
09 October 2024
Automating the taking of witness statements in criminal cases using AI
Can the taking of witness statements in criminal cases be automated using artificial intelligence (AI)? The University of Groningen (UG), Capgemini Netherlands and Scotty AI signed a letter of intent today to jointly research the development of an...
-
17 September 2024
Vehicles without a driver: who is liable if things go wrong?
In the coming years, self-driving cars may increasingly become part of daily life. But who is liable if things go wrong?