Skip to ContentSkip to Navigation
About us Latest news News News articles

Dutch dialects and their relationship to standard Dutch

09 September 2011

Researchers at the University of Groningen and the University of Alberta have investigated which factors are involved in the differences in pronunciation between standard Dutch and hundreds of Dutch dialects.

The most important factors appear to be geographical location, the number of inhabitants and the average age of a certain community, but lexical factors such as frequency and the type of word (noun or verb) play a role as well. In relation to geography, pronunciation in the peripheral areas (Friesland, Groningen, Twente, Limburg and Zeeland) differs more from standard Dutch than that spoken in the western Randstad region and the middle of the country.

Places with a larger population and a lower average age tend on average to have a pronunciation that is closer to standard Dutch. With regard to lexical factors, nouns and the more frequently used words differ more from standard Dutch.

Reverse pattern

The exact effect of the factors ‘average age’ and ‘number of inhabitants’, however, varied significantly for individual words.  Although the dialect pronunciation of most words in a larger town or city with a low average age is closer to standard Dutch, some words show a reverse pattern. The words bier (beer) and vrij (free), for instance, differ more greatly from standard Dutch in towns and cities with more and younger inhabitants.

Political influence
The results clearly show that the changes in pronunciation (towards standard Dutch) began in the western, economic and political centre of the Netherlands and, in particular for less frequently used words, then spread to the peripheral areas of the country. These changes were adopted to a lesser extent in areas where the western region had less political influence for historical reasons.

The article has been published in the academic open source journal PLoS ONE and can be accessed at no cost via: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023613.

Note for the press

For more information: Martijn Wieling, Computational Linguistics, tel. 050-3635977, e-mail: m.b.wieling rug.nl

Last modified:13 March 2020 01.55 a.m.
View this page in: Nederlands

More news

  • 08 October 2024

    Tracking the tongue

    Thomas Tienkamp and Teja Rebernik explain how fundamental research on articulation could help explain speech disorders and may contribute to the recovery of people with speech disorders in the future.

  • 08 October 2024

    Passion for sustainable fashion

    Chilean journalist María Pilar Uribe Silva has dedicated half her life to making the clothing industry more sustainable. This summer, she started a PhD project at the RUG. ‘I think it is possible, a more just and sustainable clothing sector. What...

  • 01 October 2024

    Will there be a female American president?

    Historian Jelte Olthof is interested in the origins, workings, and influence of the US Constitution. How does the 1787 Constitution function in present-day America? An America that is rapidly changing and where, in 2024, a female president may be...