A neutral conception of punishment. A philosophical analysis
PhD ceremony: Mr. V.C. Geeraets, 16.15 uur, Doopsgezinde Kerk, Oude Boteringestraat 33, Groningen
Dissertation: A neutral conception of punishment. A philosophical analysis
Promotor(s): prof. A.R. Mackor, prof. W. van der Burg
Faculty: Law
The claim central of Geeraets’s dissertation is that a neutral conception offers a better interpretation of the concept of punishment than a normative conception. The point of the neutral conception is that it characterises a number of impositions as punishment which are normally not classified as such. Particularly, the neutral conception classifies the Dutch reparative sanction (administrative law), the measure of TBS (a response to the violation of a norm by someone who is suffering from a mental disease) and the measure of ISD (a response to repeat offence) as punishment. The normative conception - in contrast - stipulates that these sanctions are not punishment. Despite the fact that the normative conception is better in line with how the concept of punishment is employed in the legal arena, Geeraets maintains that the neutral conception is more fruitful. Adoption of the normative conception can easily result in what he calls quietism. By denoting these sanctions as something other than punishment, it encourages a quietism that takes them to be therefore less problematic than punishment, or requiring less in the way of protective procedures and constraints than punishment does. Instead, the neutral conception obliges us to bring into the open what choices we make and to make explicit what, for example, the basis is for a differentiation in legal protection.
The goal in this dissertation is to develop a neutral conception and to discuss and rebut possible objections. To this end, the following subjects pass in review: the justificatory theories of retributivism and utilitarianism, the legal principle ‘no punishment without guilt’, the principle of proportionality, the distinction between direct and oblique intent and the idea that by means of punishment the personality of the offender is respected. In each case, Geeraets investigates how the idea in question relates to the concept of punishment.
Last modified: | 13 March 2020 01.11 a.m. |
More news
-
02 September 2025
Adi Stoykova receives research grant from the Max Planck Institute for the use of AI in criminal law
Assistant Professor Radina (Adi) Stoykova has been awarded a research scholarship by Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security & Law in Freiburg.
-
28 August 2025
Much more can be done to tackle psychologicalviolence through criminal law
Much more needs to be done to effectively tackle psychological violence through criminal law. This is the conclusion of University of Groningen researchers Anna Goldberg, Niels Hedlund, Martina Althoff, Kai Lindenberg and Michiel van der Wolf in...
-
22 August 2025
Public Academy for the Judiciary Special – The fight against the mafia: 13 September
This special edition of the Public Academy for the Judiciary focuses on the fight against the mafia. International speakers, including former President of the Palermo Court Antonio Balsamo and Dr. Laura Peters (University of Groningen), will discuss...